Skip to content
Qualityforeveryone
Lesson 5 of 5≈ 3 min read
View All Lessons →

Choosing Actions That Lower Occurrence or Detection and Recalculating RPN

Audio Narration (Voxtral)Voxtral♀ Female Voice

Choosing Actions That Lower Occurrence or Detection and Recalculating RPN

An action is only worth listing if it changes a score. In a process FMEA, the scores you can realistically move are occurrence and detection. Occurrence falls when you remove or control the cause: a fixture that sets insertion depth, a locked parameter, a better tool-change rule. Detection falls when you add or improve a control that catches the mode: a 100 percent leak test, a go/no-go gauge, a vision check.

Severity almost never changes from a process action, because it describes what the effect does to the user. Only a product or process design change that alters the effect itself moves severity, for example a connector design that cannot be assembled short. If a team claims a training session reduced severity, the row needs another look.

After the action is implemented and shown to work, re-score the row with the same scales and recalculate RPN = S × O × D. Keep the before and after side by side. Thresholds such as "act on anything above 100" are a useful starting filter, but they are arbitrary. Never nudge a score down to slip under a line, and never assume a row at 95 is safe because the cutoff is 100.

Key Concept
Actions lower occurrence by controlling the cause or lower detection by adding a control; severity stays put without a design change; recalculate RPN after the fix is proven.
Practical Example
For the unseated connector (S 8, O 4, D 6, RPN 192) the team installs an insertion stop fixture that holds depth at 9.5 mm, and a 100 percent pressure decay leak test at 300 kPa. Six weeks of data show short insertions have dropped to 1 in 5,000, so occurrence falls to 2. The leak test catches every seeded leak in a 50-unit challenge, so detection falls to 3. Severity stays at 8. New RPN = 8 × 2 × 3 = 48. For the under-cured adhesive row (S 7, O 5, D 7, RPN 245), a UV intensity check each shift brings occurrence to 3 and a bond pull test on 5 units per lot brings detection to 4: new RPN = 7 × 3 × 4 = 84.

Standard Procedure

  1. 1For each priority row, decide whether the action targets the cause (occurrence) or the control (detection), or both.
  2. 2Implement the action and collect enough data to show it works.
  3. 3Re-score occurrence and detection honestly; leave severity unchanged unless the design changed.
  4. 4Recalculate the RPN and record before and after values with the evidence.
  5. 5Review rows just below any threshold on their own merits rather than treating the threshold as a pass line.

Lesson Summary

  • ✓Lower occurrence by fixing the cause; lower detection by adding a reliable control.
  • ✓Re-score after proving the action, and never adjust scores just to clear a threshold.

Progress Tracking

Sign in to save your lesson completion markers.

🎉 You have reached the final lesson of this course!

When you feel confident with the material, proceed to the final assessment to test your knowledge and earn your certificate.